Painting Red Dress Dancing

worlds evil? Love

A friend tells me ...
is discussing with his cartoonist confidence horrors of translation, lettering, etc.. Planeta De Agostini, after having reported the last two volumes Hellblazer (read what it says here smoky man and here). My friend said that the number and quality of errors is likely to consider those copies fallacious. And that is a sign of extreme superficiality of editorial work. For this reason, the refunds. The cartoonist, trustworthy person and very transparent, accepted copies and returned the money . Agreeing in general with the position of my friend.

Then my friend says, Have you ever seen similar errors in the production Panini Comics, what is in effect the main competitor of Planeta? The comparison is correct. Panini has proven in many years of attention to this type of error to the appropriate professional. A rare, rare find comics with spelling errors, not to mention balloons in other languages \u200b\u200bor other amenities.
The cartoonist of my friend put it on. Panini Comics is evil, he says. It will not make that level of error, he says, but over the years has accustomed readers to read more bad things and packaged in the worst ways. To give an example to my friend, take one of the last balloons Avengers with art three or four wings folded, to show him how the pages are larger than the cover, which did not cover completely folded. Yes, I think my friend, a job really bad. A job that Panini has always been that way. Production needs, says the cartoonist. Unacceptable, says the cartoonist. Not to mention, he said, the quality of manga publishing and the quality of other productions, such as the 100%, from the French made smaller volumes.

You may agree, but the comparison does not hold with Planeta. Planeta publishes a work full of errors. The reader, knowingly buy a product and when the law is different from how it should be. Flawed. Sandwiches following an editorial line, debatable, but made with professionalism. What you see and you expect looking at the product purchase, is what you will find reading it. Rather, the reader is not buying a product that does not like. The cartoonist
but insists, Panini is evil. Because of him, readers have become accustomed to everything.

I wonder, having the respect that I firmly for freedom of choice of players, we all have the responsibility to purchase, where does this perception of an insider? The problem is intolerance
of having to fill out the health food store that does not appreciate at the expense of others that he would consider more important, interesting, because it is what we look for? Or, there really is a mechanism miseducation downward?

Harry